My Morning Cup of “What the Eff??” Paula Deen’s an Idiot

Yesterday was a pretty cool day. I got to sleep in, cook a good meal or two, watch some evening news, and got a slammin workout in. However, as you may allude due to the title of this post, I saw something on the evening news that kind of made me want to walk out into traffic in a blind incomprehensible stupor of unbelieving. A very popular comfort-food television cook, famous for making foods that would make your arteries cough just to see them, recently came out saying that she was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. A big reason she made this announcement public (and after a 3 year period from being initially diagnosed) was the fact that she’s now a paid endorser of a specific diabetes medication by a pharmaceutical company.

Here’s the really funny thing: Anthony Bourdain tweeted that he was going to get into the leg breaking business so he could clean up on sales of crutches, which was a simply hilarious stab at Deen’s choice to not disclose this information after diagnosis and while she continued to market and sell foods that make people rediculously sick and obese.

Anthony Bourdain is officially awesome. That is one of my all-time favorite snarky tweets.

In a follow-up interview, when asked if she felt the dietary choices she made, such as deep-frying a store-bough cheesecake (Huh??) or making a burger out of 2 donuts for the buns (SERIOUSLY?!?!), may have contributed to her development of diabetes, she said that she didn’t believe so, claiming it was due to her genetics.

Now let me get this straight. After peddling foods that would even make endocrinologists want to hit things, foods that are all highly correlated to the development of diabetes, even if eaten only sporadically yet regularly, you’re not even willing to say that there is a possibility that your diet and lifestyle played a role in a disease that is directly related to the individuals’ diet and lifestyle?

But let’s say for a second that it IS actually due to her genes and not her diet. This would mean that she would have had to have a complete genetic workup to determine which of the dominant diabetic alleles (if any) she possessed. Of the 18 independent genotypic loci determined to have a direct linkage to type 2 diabetes and the 30 or so that are indirectly linked to the development, those with the greatest risk of developing the disease would have to have more than 24 alleles in order to have a higher chance of developing the disease compared to someone who had less than 10 alleles, and this rate is only found in around 1.8% of the population (based on a large research trial performed by the UK Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Consortium, and referenced HERE), or around the same percentage of people who feel Tracy Andersons’ future spawn will come out of the womb looking orange and have her mother call them fat.

When they looked at the risk of developing diabetes in correlation to age, gender, and body mass index, the inclusion of having more of the specific diabetic alleles on their individual genetic profile didn’t amount to much more than a 0.02 difference in area under the curve, meaning having the genetic pre-cursors for developing diabetes doesn’t mean jack.

So let’s say she went to the effort to have her entire genetic sequence mapped out (unlikely), found out she had a genetic predisposition to posessing more than 24 of the identified alleles linked to diabetes (less than 1.2% of the population would qualify for this), and also qualified as having genetic susceptibility to her hemoglobin A1C molecule being more fubar’d than an episode of Jersey Shore, I might be inclined to believe it was genetically based. Now, if she also had a monozygotic identical twin who exercised regularly and ate a well-balanced healthy diet and who was also diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, then I would actually believe that her genetics were the main influencer, not her environment. That being said, she is willing to cut back on her intake of sweet tea, so I guess that’s something right?

This kind of stuff ticks me off. I mean, here she is with a diagnosis that’s telling her she is doing something really wrong with her health, and she’s trying to play the victim and blame something that’s out of her control, meaning everyone can still like her and buy her recipe books because they’re not that bad for you!! Meanwhile, she can still sell you some of the medication that will help you stay alive after demolishing your pancreas and cellular insulin sensitivity, all the while not believing the evidence that the food she’s jamming down people’s throats is what may be causing the problems in the first place. Win Win!!!!

We as a society need to raise the bar of respect for ourselves by taking ownership of our actions. If you get sick, it’s because of something you did or didn’t do, not because of some latent feature that is only loosely related. If you get a cold, it’s typically because you either work in an environment that has a lot of cold bugs floating around, you’re eating like crap and not giving your body the nutrition it needs, and not getting enough sleep to help recover your immune system properly. If you’re gaining weight, it’s because you’re not eating well enough or not exercising properly. If you hate your job and don’t make enough money, it’s your business to find a new job you enjoy and that pays you well enough to do what you want to do.

I think the vast size of the shit-kicking she’s taking in the media right now is a combination of the acute irony of it all, as well as the fact that she’s not accepting responsibility for her disease while simultaneously hocking the pills she’s being paid to sell to help treat the disease. Even the Sham-Wow guy is looking at her and thinking “Wow, you’re an idiot if you think that’s going to be a good sales pitch lady.”

I’m sure from a PR standpoint, she would become a lot more popular if she had said something along the lines of “You know, maybe cooking all that crap was what got me here in the first place. I’m going to dedicate the rest of my career to showing you how you can still lead a decadent life without running the risk of developing diabetes by using different ingredients that still taste great.” Then she would go on to make things with fruits, veggies, herbs and spices, and different types of grains that would still make your mouth water and not make you piss Kool Aid at the same time.

But that would take some effort, and be mildly inconvenient to learn something different. Perish the thought.

 

No related posts.

  • http://www.michaelgrayfitness.com/ Michael Gray

    Ho. Ly. Crap.  I have to say I’m a bit speechless at people’s inabilities to see how their choices effect their health.  Ah, the age of zero responsibility…Nice work Dean!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=742925110 Jim Smith

    There. Are. No. Words… no.. nothing.

  • http://heyjoob.com Juliet

    I have mixed feelings on the Paula-debacle.  On the one side, I agree with everything you’ve said.  Her public endorsement of big pharma sends the horrible message of “eat crap & slap a bandaid on it”.  It is particularly frustrating in a society that is always striving for the quick fix.

    On the flip side, she never once attempted branding herself as the image of health.  Sure she didn’t admit she had diabetes, but she didn’t claim her food would make you healthy either.  Most people, without ever having read a nutrition article in their lives, could probably tell you her food is garbage for your general well being.  Perhaps Darwinism will kick in for the folks who believe otherwise (OKAY. That’s kind of a morbid joke, sorry.)

    Marion Nestle made a fabulous point on the issue yesterday (here: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2012/01/weighing-in-on-paula-deens-type-2-diabetes/) Victoza costs about $500/month.  Ouch. I could buy a personalized exercise and nutrition program by elite coaches for less than that.

  • Miranda Diakiw

    Well I’m not totally shocked. Pharmaceuticals are big business. Food TV is big business. They really aren’t in it for health reasons. And society really isn’t all that interested in lifestyle changes that require effort if there’s a pill that will fix them up. Could you imagine a show about different kinds of cigarettes and cigars, where the host ends up with lung cancer but says he’s not going to stop smoking but ends up promoting a pharmaceutical company that just happens to promote chemotherapy drugs? People would be up in arms.

  • Pingback: Strength and Conditioning Stuff You Should Read: 1/24/12 | Eric Cressey | High Performance Training, Personal Training

  • Flandria

    she smokes 1.5 pack a day, too…unfortunately sad

  • Stephen Thomas

    Dean entertaining post!  Although I agree with you about her financially strategic timing for announcing she has type 2 diabetes I don’t feel she is at fault, even if she never announced her condition.  Her profession is a southern comfort food cook and thats what she cooks.  We don’t need degrees in nutrient to know that comfort food is high in calories, fat, and sugar.  By no means is she forcing people to eat the food she cooks and I believe everything is good in moderation, except deep fried butter (you should never eat that!).  As you said, we as a society need to take responsibility for our own actions but she should not be blamed for exposing millions of Americans to type 2 diabetes because she cooks that type of food.  People need to have well power and make the right decisions for their health.  It is obviously of no surprise to me that she has type 2 diabetes since being over weight and her age significantly increases her risk but I do think there is some truth to her genetics claim.  The American Diabetes Association has stated “Type 2 diabetes has a stronger link to family history and lineage than type 1, although it too depends on environmental factors.”  and they go on to say “If you have a family history of type 2 diabetes, it may be difficult to
    figure out whether your diabetes is due to lifestyle factors or genetic
    susceptibility. Most likely it is due to both.”  Most type 2 diabetic patients that I have seen do report a family history.  It is difficult to determine if the eating habits and lifestyle characteristics are also passed down through families or if it actually genetic.  Although I do think there was a genetic susceptibility that increased due to her age and was then triggered by poor eating habits and a lack of exercise.  From my experience, a patient that develops type 2 diabetes at her age has very little chance at reversing her disease even with a change in diet and exercise.  Just my 2 cents!

  • Pingback: Thoughtful Reads for the Day! | Fitness Pez Dispenser

  • Oneskweek

    I can’t say I’m surprised. I had a co worker like that. There is a link between being overweight, chronic lack of sleep, and age to diabetes, and she was guilty of all the above. Any reference to making serious changes to her lifestyle caused a poop storm. My co worker, while avoiding things that raised her sugar alarmingly, still ate ham or bacon sandwiches every day and blamed it on her genetics. I’m not sure why, but lots of people will do anything rather than make lifestyle changes.

  • Paul Browne

    Great piece Dean. Clowns like her mis-informing the masses should be put in there place (or have their asses kicked)…

  • http://profiles.google.com/dushyant91 Dushyant Patel

    Bit of an overstatement to say: 
    having the genetic pre-cursors for developing diabetes doesn’t mean jack.

    It also depends on race e.g. icmr.nic.in/ijmr/2007/march/0305.pdf and some of the studies cite don the wiki article say it’s 10% not 0.2%.

    And since the risk of getting type II is tied in with bodyfat, which also has an element of heredity to it you can’t say it means jack. Again take the Indian population which his genetically predisposed to have a higher level of body fat at the same BMI score as non Indians.

    But I agree on the criticism of this individual